A simple animated explanation of HOW the private Federal Reserve steals your money and WHY it must be stopped.
Mel Gibson: “I’ll End Up Dead If I Keep Talking Shit”
by The Agoraphile
The mainstream media is again abuzz with voices denouncing Mel Gibson for alleged misdoings. Self-declared “voice of the left” Arianna Huffington has even argued for a revival of “Hollywood values” [sic] and for Gibson to be burned at the stake:
“(…) Now is the time”, invokes Huffington, “for Hollywood to show what those values really are by making Gibson pay the price for his bigotry and intolerance.”
Meanwhile, new evidence has emerged that raises serious doubts as to the veracity of the claims made against Gibson.
“These copies were professionally made for distribution,” said forensic audio and video expert, Arlo West, CEO of Creative Forensic Services in an interview with Holly-WoodLife, “Their quality is extraordinary …I would be willing to bet that someone with a background in recording these types of messages helped Oksana do so to entrap Gibson. I would also expect that a person or persons also helped her edit the recordings.”
Arlo insists the recordings have been professionally edited, probably to eliminate words or piece together phrases.
“The audio files were most certainly edited intentionally and the forensic terminology for this, is tampering,” says Arlo. “The edits that I found would have been done postrecording and are clearly done to redact dialog — which means to intentionally remove words,” says Arlo. “I can tell there are gaps and edits in several ways by using waveform analysis and zero crossing analysis. These are most certainly digital recordings so there is no tape involved.”
HollywoodLife.com went on to report that another forensic expert, Frank Piazza, is the President of Legalaudio.com and also worked on the Natalee Holloway case as well as others including the famous Jon Benet Ramsey murder case of 1996. Frank tells us that he can support Arlo’s finds that there were edits in the audio.
“There are redactions, things were taken out, there were obviously things people didn’t want others to hear,” says Frank.
“The most interesting piece of information that Frank found was that Mel was coming through a standard phone while Oksana was speaking through a high tech microphone,” reported HollywoodLife.
“Oksana was speaking through a large diaphragm microphone,” according to Frank. “Mel’s responses are on another channel and he is on a speaker phone. Whoever is helping her is patching it through to her. They are using something called a hybrid coupler which is used to separate the two voices. The coupler’s purpose is to accept a phone line and enable you to record what’s coming back from the phone conversation.”
The blogosphere is saturated with independent reporting on the case, many arguing that Gibson has been deliberately targeted for politically motivated reasons.
Paul Watson of Infowars.com reported: “Just like in the days of J. Edgar Hoover, when every important person both inside and outside Hollywood had the dubious honor of reserved blackmail-space in the FBI-director’s desk, the arrows have now been directed at Gibson, not for anything he might have done mind you, but rather with the aim of stopping the man from capturing audiences around the world with any more influential films about freedom versus tyranny. In other words: the current “controversy” serves to hinder the filmmaker from doing his job. In an age where many filmmakers, sniffing it up in the bathroom, are instruments for the New World Order by producing predictive programming to audiences everywhere, the crusade launched against Gibson should raise all thinking people’s eyebrows.”
Watson elaborates as to the motivation for Gibson’s character assassination by pointing to an interview conducted by Playboy in 1995, wherein “Gibson identified the power behind the throne with stunning accuracy”.
“With the conversation turning towards then-president of the United States, Bill Clinton, Gibson suggested that he was obviously groomed for the job early on in his career”.
“Do you really believe that?”, asked the surprised interviewer (which he shouldn’t be), to which Gibson replied:
“I really believe that. He was a Rhodes scholar, right? Just like Bob Hawke. Do you know what a Rhodes scholar is? Cecil Rhodes established the Rhodes scholarship for those young men and women who want to strive for a new world order. Have you heard that before? George Bush? CIA? Really, it’s Marxism, but it just doesn’t call itself that. Karl had the right idea, but he was too forward about saying what it was. Get power but don’t admit to it. Do it by stealth. There’s a whole trend of Rhodes scholars who will be politicians around the world.”
“Flabbergasted by his words,” continued Watson, “the interviewer retreaded to the mantra of the numb and the ignorant when confronted with a sudden outburst of truth:”
“This certainly sounds like a paranoid sense of world history. You must be quite an assassination buff.”
Gibson: “Oh, fuck. A lot of these guys pulled a boner. There’s something to do with the Federal Reserve that Lincoln did, Kennedy did and Reagan tried. I can’t remember what it was, my dad told me about it. Everyone who did this particular thing that would have fixed the economy got undone. Anyway, I’ll end up dead if I keep talking shit.”
“Not dead, thank God. Although the New World Order is pulling all the stops to make sure his career will be.”, concludes Watson.
Others in the blogosphere have raised questions about Oksana herself, pointing out that “twice-divorced 39 year-old Oksana is an ambitious girl from the former Soviet Union, with ties to individuals such as Sergey Kuzmin, who had ties with career criminals and underworld figures throughout Russia and EU.” One blogger ends with the question, “Could it be that she was introduced to Gibson for the purpose of blackmail and subversion?”
In an interesting juxtaposition to the Gibson drama, polish Jew Roman Polanski, it was reported, will not be extradited to the U.S. from Switzerland for drugging, raping, and sodomizing a 13-year old girl. Much of the Hollywood crowd and corporate media have been supportive of Polanski, marginalizing the scandal and holding him in high regard.
– Agoraphile
Bernard Madoff and Financial Pyramid Schemes
Written by Charles Scaliger
Wednesday, 17 December 2008 11:21
The world’s wealthy and well-connected are reeling from disclosures that an international investment giant – Wall Street-based Bernard Madoff Investment Securities LLC, run by 70-year old Bernard Madoff, a well-known Wall Street investor – has turned out to be a colossal pyramid scheme with worthless assets.
It turns out that Madoff’s firms’ money was nowhere to be found when some of his clients, including a number of Europe’s largest banks, began demanding the return of their invested assets. They had all been invested elsewhere and had disappeared.
Predictably enough, the United States government, as embodied by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC), is stepping in to help the likes of Spain’s Banco de Santander and Fortis Bank Netherlands, as well as wealthy individuals like Steven Spielberg.
The irony of this story, which the major news media have declined to mention, is that the only reason Madoff is being treated as a criminal is that he is not running a bank, much less a central bank. The entire banking industry is in fact a vast pyramid scheme, with central banks like the Federal Reserve at the apex. Fractional-reserve banking, even when anchored by a commodity like gold, requires banks to loan out assets that are supposedly available on demand for customers, like the monies used for checking and savings accounts. Thus banks pyramid non-existent assets on top of a fraction of their reserves, and hope against hope that customers will not decide to demand a return of their assets en masse – an obligation that no bank can meet.
The situation is made worse by the absence of a gold standard. Nowadays, banks pyramid all their assets atop reserves based on nothing but the say-so of the central banks and the governments that sponsor them. That say-so is nothing more than the state’s arrogated authority to declare scraps of paper legal tender, and to compel people to accept them as money. Thus the Federal Reserve, America’s central bank, creates so-called “fiat” money according to the whim of its chairman and directors, money that is not linked to redeemable assets of any kind. Such activity not only preserves the illusion of bank solvency by pouring new reserves into the banking system whenever needed, but also gradually and subtly erodes the value of the dollar itself. In an age of fiat money and universal inflation, fractional reserve banking is the ultimate pyramid scheme.
But because the modern banking system enjoys the countenance of law, nary a whimper of protest is raised when the misbegotten policies of the Federal Reserve and other central banks cause currencies to lose their value and markets to collapse. The deceptive practices involved in central banking amount to theft and fraud on a grand scale, but are never treated as crimes even though they take a much greater toll than the occasional misdemeanors of private-sector hucksters like Bernard Madoff.
Madoff will doubtless go to prison for his crimes; in a just world, the architects of the fraud that is inflationary central banking would join him there.